Linstone Housing - RAAC Removal and Roof Replacement Works to existing properties

The Contract is anticipated to principally involve removal of RAAC beneath existing roofs of top floor flats and common close areas, replacement of existing membrane roof and associated works to existing blocks of flats at 1 & 2 Alford Place and 160, 182 & 202 Gilmartin Road, Linwood, Renfrewshire. The Contract Works are envisaged to include;

a) Removal of existing RAAC below the existing membrane roof areas covering the top floor flats and common close areas including removal of existing bituminous roof coverings, timber supports and ceiling finishes;

b) Formation of a temporary crash deck and acrow props below areas of existing RAAC within common close and top floor flats;

c) New single ply roofing membrane, insulation, timber joists, timber supports, fireline boarding and suspended ceiling systems in replacement of existing removed RAAC;

d) Infilling sections of existing wall pockets with new engineering brickwork following the removal of the RAAC;

e) Replacement of existing roof tiling, battens, membrane, sarking boards, fascia boards, verge boards and soffit boards to existing butterfly pitched roofs;

f) Rot surveys and works to joist ends of existing butterfly pitched roofs;

g) Replacement of existing top floor common close windows and finishes; and

h) Alterations to existing light fittings within the common close and top floor flat areas where the RAAC is being removed.

SPD, Part IV Section C 'Technical and Professional Ability' will be scored on a pass or

fail basis using the following scoring methodology;

0 - Unacceptable - Nil or inadequate response. Fails to demonstrate an ability to meet the requirement. A Tenderer which scores ‘0 –

Unacceptable’ against any question will be disqualified.

1 - Poor - Response is partially relevant and poor. The response addresses some elements of the requirement but contains

insufficient/limited detail or explanation to demonstrate how the requirement will be fulfilled.

2 - Acceptable - Response is relevant and acceptable. The response addresses a broad understanding of the requirement but may lack details

on how the requirement will be fulfilled in certain areas.

3 - Good - Response is relevant and good. The response is sufficiently detailed to demonstrate a good understanding and provides details

on how the requirements will be fulfilled.

4 – Very Good - Response is largely relevant and very good. The response demonstrates a very good understanding of the requirements and

provides adequate details on how the requirements will be fulfilled.

5 - Excellent - Response is completely relevant and excellent overall. The response is comprehensive, unambiguous and demonstrates a thorough understanding of the requirement and provides details of how the requirement will be met in full.

A Tenderer will be required to achieve a minimum score of 2 against each Question within Part C, i.e. a score of 2 or greater shall represent a Pass whereas a score of 1 or lower will represent a Fail.

Linstone Housing will disregard, and not evaluate the remainder of a Tenderers bid should the Tenderer fail to achieve the minimum score of 2 (a Pass) against any of the Questions included with Part C