Provision of a 200mm High Performance Electron Beam Lithography System

The University is looking to procure a new 200mm capable high throughput Electron Beam Lithography (EBL) Write Tool for the Southampton Nanofabrication Centre, to be used by researchers, students, and the wider UK academic community to provide state-of-the-art nanometer scale lithography service.

The Southampton Nanofabrication Centre is a state-of-the-art

facility for microfabrication and high-spec nanofabrication, as well

as a wide range of characterisation capabilities, housed in a

purpose built, 820m2 cleanroom in the Mountbatten Complex at

the University of Southampton.

One of the premier cleanrooms in Europe, the Centre has a

uniquely broad range of technologies, combining traditional and

novel top down fabrication with state-of-the-art bottom up

fabrication. This allows us to develop and produce a wide range of

devices in diverse fields such as electronics, nanotechnology and

bio nanotechnology and incorporate them into an equally

comprehensive array of nano and microsystems for analysis and

use. The characterisation capability is similarly extensive catalogue of microscopes and test gear, from nanometre resolution scanning microscopes to electrical, magnetic and RF analysis.

The University is looking to procure a new 200mm capable high throughput Electron Beam Lithography (EBL) Write Tool for the Southampton Nanofabrication Centre, to be used by researchers, students, and the wider UK academic community to provide state-of-the-art nanometer scale lithography service. The user base for the new instrument will be approximately 40 users.

The University is conducting this procurement using the open

procedure in accordance with the requirements of the Regulations

for the purpose of procuring the goods and services described in

the Specification.

The University proposes to enter into a Contract for up to sixteen

years. This will be the maximum contract period, including any potential extensions with the successful tenderer.

This contract term will comprise:

The initial contract period, comprising;

• A period of twelve months to cover the estimated lead time of the instrument,
• A two-year warranty period, and
• A four-year comprehensive service agreement

Followed by

• A further nine x twelve-month optional extension periods to the

comprehensive service agreement, subject to the satisfactory

performance and at the discretion of the University.

The contract will be effective on signing. The two-year warranty

period and four-year service agreement will run from the date of

delivery and acceptance of the equipment, estimated to be twelve

months after the commencement of the contract. Extensions, if

agreed, shall run from the expiry of the initial service agreement

period (year seven), if so agreed by the University. The Contract

will run for a maximum of sixteen years up until September 2038

(actual date is TBC following contract award).

The anticipated total value of the proposed solution including all of the extension periods shown above should be within the range of £4m to £5m excluding VAT. It is anticipated that the cost of the instrument itself and core services related to its installation and commissioning will be in the value of £3.14m GBP excluding VAT.

All related components, delivery, installation, commissioning, training, services, and maintenance MUST be included within the proposal.

Whilst bidders are expected to provide a proposal that falls within this budget, for the benefit of doubt, the University will not automatically exclude any bidders whose proposal exceeds this figure.

All related components, delivery, installation, commissioning, training, services, and maintenance MUST be included within the proposal.

Details of current expenditure or potential future uptake are given as a guide based on past purchasing and current planning to assist you in the preparation of your Tender. They should not be interpreted as an undertaking to purchase any goods or services to any particular value and do not form part of the Contract.

This procurement is not suitable for splitting into lots. The risk of

dividing the requirement into Lots would render the execution of

the contract excessively technically difficult, not cost effective and would undermine proper execution of the contract. Additional information: This procurement is not suitable for splitting into lots. The risk of

dividing the requirement into Lots would render the execution of

the contract excessively technically difficult, not cost effective and would undermine proper execution of the contract.